The Supreme Court Betrays Its Peerage

May She Rest in Peace

My Friends, I tell you now that I have no idea how we came to this ugly pass. Did not the slow-witted child of Our Friend George Bush install two of Our most subservient legal figures to the Supreme Court in order to see that Our Status would be protected there? And yet one of these persons has now betrayed the trust We placed in him and joined with the Communist wing of the Court to rule that poor people should be allowed access to a lesser-quality version of the same health care that You and I enjoy! Now The Peasant may live nearly as long as real people! Truly America has died this day.

Perhaps I am being hyperbolic, you say. Well, if you will not listen to me, listen to the completely sober analysis of Benwise Shapiro of Crickhollow in Buckland, who I do not believe is One of Us, but aspires to be all the same. For one of the Untouchable Class, this Shapiro certainly does have a keen insight with respect to the savage violence that has been done upon Our Persons by sort of upholding a law that sort of provides the lesser creatures with something approximating basic health care:

This is the greatest destruction of individual liberty since Dred Scott. This is the end of America as we know it. No exaggeration.
— benshapiro (@benshapiro) June 28, 2012

If anything, this does not go far enough. The Dred Scott decision, long held up by the Degenerate classes and their spokesthings as an example of Supreme Court excess and abuse of Our Power in the unending struggle to maintain a Proper Social Order, did nothing but affirm that those creatures who are Not Like Us should not expect to be afforded the benefits of being treated as actual Human Beings. This is simple common sense. While Dred Scott himself was returned to the status of actual property (which, for Pete's sake, One of Us purchased it, so else what would you call it?), we can simply see this as the Court's justifiable reinforcement of Our Status. This Radical Communist Roberts has, however, wholly overturned our social order by upholding the notion that the proper outcome when The Peasant contracts a major illness (to say nothing of its completely economically value-less offspring), or when it is severely injured in its efforts to further enrich Us, is something other than a quick and low-cost death.¹ Our freedom to enjoy a much longer lifespan than The Peasant, our freedom to enjoy Our Status unencumbered with the thought that The Peasant may also enjoy something of that status, has been murdered by the looters in our very midst.

I would also commend one Mitt "Mitt" Romney, who as you will all undoubtedly know is Our Candidate to unseat the Negro President and who is most certainly One of Us. Master Romney notes that the Negro President's health care abomination will add "trillions" to the deficit and result in employers, Us, refusing to employ additional Untouchables. While neither of these statements is, in any "factual" sense, true, facts are notoriously uncooperative to Our needs when attempting to preserve Our Status from the dirty grabbing hands of the moocher horde. Kudos to Master Romney for seeing this, and refusing to be cowed from delivering Our Message by an uncooperative reality.

1 I do not wish to imply here that We would like to see The Peasant die before it has exhausted its ability to pay its meager wealth to Us via Our Medical Concerns. I mean "quick" only insofar as it ceases to exists quickly after it has done what it can to further enrich Us, and "low-cost" insofar as it should die before it becomes a burden on the moocher/welfare system and thereby begins sucking our hard inherited monies from our own pockets in order to lengthen its existence.

A Question of Terminology

As this venue is intended to facilitate a frank discussion among society's Winners as to how to preserve our way of life in the face of incessant persecution from lesser creatures such as those who are poor, it would behoove us to settle on the best terminology to use when referring to those denizens of the lower 99.9 (let's be honest here) percent. I have always preferred "The Peasant" as my term of choice when referring to these lowly beings. The word itself accurately depicts its condition, and retaining the singular while making it a proper noun provides just the right touch of dehumanization to convey the appropriate message. However, there are many other terms that can be used to accurately describe The Peasant and its proper role in the social order of things. I offer the following poll as a way for us, the successful, to settle on the best possible language.

What terminology should this venue adopt when referring to the common people?

Salutations

This is a "blog," which I am told is something read by the Common Man (and Woman; I am to understand that one must utilize the pronouns of both genders in common discourse nowadays) by perusing the "Internet," which it has been explained to me is a series of tubes through which travel words and pictures of cats, among other items. It is very likely that, this being a commoner's communication medium, you, the reader, are yourself a commoner of some sort. Perhaps you are a person who repairs things, or waits tables like the delightful brown-skinned children at my club. You may be one of those vile public school teachers, always attempting to fill the head of the Peasant with information that it really does not require, or possibly you are even one of those loathsome government employees, constantly expecting those of us who have made something of our lives to sacrifice our hard-won stock earnings and the like in order to pay for conveniences that the Peasant depends upon for survival, but which it did not earn by finding wealthy forebears for itself and accruing as much of their inheritance as possible. If you are any of those people, or their other commoner cohorts (and if you do not know if you are a commoner, you are one), this "blog" is not for you. It is a blog for the Right Sort of People, and you are not it. If you insist on remaining here, I must warn you that you will be prying into the discourse of your social betters, and this is completely inappropriate. Unfortunately there is nothing I can do to prevent your unwanted intrusion, but please do the rest of us the courtesy of being seen, and not heard, which in the case of this "Internet" tube system is an excellent compromise since you cannot be seen, either.

However, for fellow Right Sort of People, welcome! Here it is my hope that we can have a frank discussion of our much-imperiled way of life. The barbarians are at the gates, my friends, and here we can talk free of the inconvenient prying eyes of the mass media, which while wholly owned by and wholly subservient to us, still seems uncomfortable with explicit conversation about what can be done to eliminate the Peasant and/or to counter its cruel vendetta against Us. Our freedom is not free, my friends; it must be paid for with the effort, pain, suffering, blood, and occasionally viscera of People Who Are Not Us. Let us here dedicate ourselves to making sure that those people are making the appropriate sacrifices so that We might have the comfort and security that We deserve.